LOUCURA, ESCRAVIDÃO E NEGRITUDE
a constituição do sujeito moderno
Resumo
The Modern Subject is constituted in front of an Other, of which figures such as Madness, Slavery and Negritude are part. The principle of separability, a central part of the modern onto-episteme according to Ferreira da Silva's approach, is central to this constitution. But separability is distancing and imbrication, as is intended to be shown here. The attributes that distinguish Madness, Slavery and Negritude are at the same time associated. And the Modern Subject constituted in front of them, will finally refer to them as its Truth
Downloads
Referências
ÁLVAREZ YÁGÜEZ, Jorge (2012). Política y República. Aristóteles y Maquiavelo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
ÁLVAREZ YÁGÜEZ, Jorge (2021). “El especial lugar de la democracia en el pensamiento de Spinoza”, en Marta Nunes da Costa (organizadora), Direito à rebelião? Reflexões críticas a partir da história da filosofia política. São Paulo : LiberArs.
AZOUVI, François (1979). «The Plague, Melancholy and the Devil», Diogenes, 108, pp. 112-130.
BARTRA, Roger (2001). Cultura y melancolía. Las enfermedades del alma en la España del Siglo de Oro, Barcelona, Anagrama.
BURROUGHS, Alexandria D. (2022) "Black Market: An Exploration of Black Mental Health in America," Psychology from the Margins: Vol. 4.
BOSTER, Dea H. (2013). African American Slavery and Disability. Bodies, Property and Power in the Antebellum South, 1800-1860. New York: Routledge.
CORTÉS LÓPEZ, José L. (1989). La esclavitud negra en la España peninsular del siglo XVI. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
DAVIS David B. (2006). Inhuman Bondage. The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DECOSTA, Miriam (ed.) (1977). Blacks in Hispanic Literature: Critical Studies. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.
DELOMBARD, Jeannine M. (2012). In the Shadows of Gallows. Race, Crime and American Civic Identity. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.
DESCARTES, René (1977). Meditaciones metafísicas. Trad. Vidal Peña. Madrid: Alfaguara.
DESCARTES, René (1904), Meditations Metaphysiques, en Oeuvres Complètes (C. Adam y P. Tannery, eds.), París, Léopold Cerf, IX
FANON, Frantz (1952). Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Seuil.
FERREIRA DA SILVA, Denise (2001), “Towards a Critique of the Socio-logos of Justice:The Analytics of Raciality and the Production of Universality” In: Social Identities, Volume 7, Number 3, pp. 421-454.
FERREIRA DA SILVA, Denise (2007), Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
FERREIRA DA SILVA, Denise (2011). “Notes for a Critique of the ‘Metaphysics of Race´”, Theory, Culture & Society, 28 (1), pp. 138-148.
FERREIRA DA SILVA, Denise (2016). “On Difference without Separability.” 32nd Bienal de São Paulo—Incerteza Viva. Edited by Jochen Volz and Júlia Rebouças. São Paulo: Fundação Bienal de São Paulo, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ON-DIFFERENCE-WITHOUT-SEPARABILITY-Silva/826f77e0a8462486c9743672a1228714fa4f4bbb
FERREIRA DA SILVA, Denise (2019), A Dívida Impagável. Trad.: Amilcar Packer, Pedro Daher. São Paulo: OIP.
FETT, Sharla (2002), Working cures: healing, health, and power on southern slave
plantations. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Paris: P.U.F.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1972). Histoire de la folie à l´âge classique. Paris: Gallimard.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1976). Histoire de la sexualité. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1994). “L´évolution de la notion d´«individu dangereux» dans la psychiatrie légale du XIX siècle”, en Dits et écrits, III. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 445-464.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1999) Les anormaux, Cours au Collège de France. 1974-1975. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.
FOUCAULT, Michel (2003). Le pouvoir psychiatrique, Cours au Collège de France. 1973-1974. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.
FOUCAULT, Michel (2012). Mal faire, dire vrai. Fonction de l´aveu en justice, F. Brion, B.E. Harcourt (de). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
FRA MOLINERO, Baltasar (1995), La imagen de los negros en el teatro del Siglo de Oro. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
FRACCHIA, Carmen (2019). Black but Human. Slavery and Visual Art in Hapsburg Spain, 1480-1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HEGEL, G.W.F. (1974). Lecciones sobre la Filosofía de la Historia Universal, trad. José Gaos. Madrid: Rev. de Occidente.
HAMMONDS, Evelynn M. and HERZIG, Rebecca M. edit. (2008). The Nature of Difference. Sciences of Race in the United States from Jefferson to Genomics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
HOGARTH, Rana A. (2017), Medicalizing blackness : making racial difference in the Atlantic world, 1780–1840. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.
JACKSON, Vanessa (2002). “In Our Own Voice: African-American Stories of Oppresssion, Survival and Recovery in Mental Health Systems”. Off Our Backs, n.º 7/8, 2003, pp. 19-21.
KLEIN, Herbert (1986). African Slavery in Latin America and the Caribbean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MARTÍN CASARES, Aurelia (2010), “Comba y Dominga. La imagen sexualizada de las negroafricanas en la literatura de cordel”, Martín Casares, Aurelia, y García Barranco, Marga, La esclavitud negroafricana en la historia de España siglos XVI y XVII, Granada, Comares.
MÉNDEZ RODRÍGUEZ, Luis (2011). Esclavos en la pintura sevillana de los Siglos de Oro. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
MYERS, Bob E. (2014). Drapetomania": Rebellion, Defiance and Free Black Insanity in the Antebellum United States. Dissertation, UCLA. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9dc055h5/qt9dc055h5_noSplash_1875a9a9f688f6f49c3222c6ecee4b42.pdf
PATTERSON, Orlando (1982). Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
PEÑA TRISTÁN, María L. (2012), La esclavitud en la literatura española de los Siglos de Oro, Tesis Doctoral. Madrid, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19717431.pdf
PERROTTA, Cosimo (1999). «La disputa sobre los pobres en los siglos XVI y XVII: España entre desarrollo y regresión», en Cuadernos de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 37, 2000, 95-120.
PHILLIPS, Ulrich B. (1918). American Negro Slavery: A Survey of the Supply, Employment
and Control of Negro Labor as Determined by the Plantation Régime. New York: D. Appleton, 1918. Puede accederse en: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11490.
PIQUERAS, José. A. (2011). La esclavitud en las Españas. Un lazo transatlántico. Madrid, Catarata.
POTSMA, Johannes M. (1990). The Dutch in the Atlantic Slave Trade 1600-1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
REED, Adam M. (2014). Mental Death Slavery, Madness and State Violence in the United StatesReed. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
REISS, Timothy J. (2005). “Descartes’s Silences on Slavery and Race”, en Andrew Vails (ed.), Race and racism in modem philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
SANTOLARÍA SIERRA, Felix (2003). El gran debate sobre los pobres en el Siglo XVI. Domingo de Soto y Juan de Robles 1545. Barcelona: Ariel.
SANTOS MORILLO, Antonio (2011), “Caracterización del negro en la literatura española del s. XVI”, Lemir, 15, 23-46.
THOMAS, Hugh (1998). La trata de esclavos. Historia del tráfico de seres humanos 1440-1870. Barcelona: Planeta.
UMEH, Uchenna (2019). “Mental Illness in Black Community, 1700-2019: a short History”. March 11, 2019, https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/mental-illness-in-black-community-1700-2019-a-short-history/
WYNTER, Sylvia (2011), “The Eye of the Other: Images of the Black in Spanish Literature”, en Miriam DeCosta-Willis, Blacks in Hispanc Literature, Baltimore, Imprint Editions,pp. 8-19.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jorge Álvarez Yágüez
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Todos os trabalhos que forem aceitos para publicação, após o devido processo avaliativo, serão publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons, na modalidade Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Esta licença permite que qualquer pessoa copie e distribua a obra total e derivadas criadas a partir dela, desde que seja dado crédito (atribuição) ao autor / à autora / aos autores / às autoras.