PRESUPOSITIONS OF THE TRANSHUMANIST PROJECT
a philosophical-interdisciplinary investigation
Abstract
The objective of the present article is to investigate the concept of technique underlying the Transhumanism project. The central question that guides our reflection can be stated as follows: What are the presuppositions and the possible pragmatic consequences of the development of the Transhumanism project in the social sphere? This question will be discussed in three steps. Firstly, the main presuppositions of the Transhumanism project are going to be presented; its conception of technique is then considered from the perspective of the Philosophy of Technology, with emphasis on the papers by Feenberg (2015) and Hui (2016). Finally, we provide a philosophical-interdisciplinary problematization of the transhumanist conception of technique, arguing that the adherents of the Transhumanism project use a reductive conception of technique. This instrumental and mechanistic conception leaves aside the self-engendered and self-organized dimension of the complex organic processes underlying the social sphere, imposing on them a supposedly scientific principle that reproduces the western illuminist desire for human domination over nature.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, T; HORKHEIMER, M. Dialética do Esclarecimento. RJ: Jorge Zahar Ed. 1985.
BOSTROM, N. A history of transhumanist thought. Journal Of Evolution and Technology. p. 1-30. abr. 2005a.
BOSTROM, N. Em defesa da dignidade pós-humana. Bioethics, Oxford, v. 19, n. 3, 2005b.
BOSTROM, N. Why I Want to be a Posthuman When I Grow Up. Medical Enhancement And Posthumanity, Oxford, p.107-137, 2008.
FEENBERG, A. O que é Filosofia da Tecnologia? Tradução de Augustín Apaza, com revisão de Newton Ramos-de-Oliveira. 17 p. ano. Disponível em: <https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/Feenberg_OQueEFilosofiaDaTecnologia.pdf>. Acesso em 25 mar 2021.
FUKUYAMA, F. Our Posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2002.
HUI, Y. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Ed. Urbanomic. 2016.
INGOLD, T. Evolução e vida social. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Vozes. 2019.
KASS, L. The New Biology: What Price Relieving Man’s Estate? Science. (v. 174, n. 4011, November 1971), p. 779-788.
KURZWEIL, R. The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed the human intelligence. New York: Viking Penguin. 1999.
MORE, M. True Transhumanism: a reply to Don Ihde. In: HANSSEL; GRASSIE. Transhumanism and its critics. Ed. Metanexus. 2011.
SAVULESCU, J; PERSSON, I. Moral Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, AI, p, 656-669, November, 2010.
YOUNG, S. Designer evolution: a transhumanist manifesto. New York: Prometheus Books, 2009.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jorge Luiz Domiciano, Maria Eunice Quilici Gonzalez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Todos os trabalhos que forem aceitos para publicação, após o devido processo avaliativo, serão publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons, na modalidade Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Esta licença permite que qualquer pessoa copie e distribua a obra total e derivadas criadas a partir dela, desde que seja dado crédito (atribuição) ao autor / à autora / aos autores / às autoras.