An Examination of Current Methodologies in Mathematics Education Through the Lenses of Purpose, Participation, and Privilege

  • Beatriz Silva D’Ambrosio Miami University (MU)
  • Dana Cox Miami University (MU)
Palavras-chave: Research Methodologies, Mathematics Education, Ethics

Resumo

In this article we reflect on our practices and begin to confront the “living contradictions” (WHITEHEAD, 1989) in our identities as researchers in mathematics education (COX et al, 2014).  From a first hand perspective we reveal and address our contradictions, organizing our discussion around the following four questions: How do we find meaning in educational research on teaching? Who is in control of the research design and who gets to participate? How should we collect and analyze data? and For what purpose do we disseminate our work? In order to best illustrate the contradictions in our work that are related to our methodological choices, we have constructed fictional dialogues that set the stage for each discussion. These dialogues capture the triggers that forced us to change the course of our research and shaped our current thinking about the ethics of conducting classroom-based research. We end this article with an invitation for readers to help define alternative research methodologies that are respectful, ethical, transformational and empowering for all participants.

Referências

BARONE, T. Commonalities and variegations: Notes on the maturation of the field of narrative research. The Journal of Educational Research, v. 103, n. 2, p. 149-153, 2010.

BROPHY, J.; GOOD, T.L. Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: WITTROCK, M. C. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan, 1986. p. 328-375.

BURTON, L. Methodology and methods in mathematics education research: where is “the why”? In: GOODCHILD, S.; ENGLISH, L. D. (Eds.). Researching mathematics classrooms: a critical examination of methodology, Westport (CT): Praeger’s Publishers, 2002. p. 1-10.

CARR, W.; KEMMIS, S. Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer, 1986.

CHRONAKI, A. Researching the school mathematics culture of “others”. Creating a self-other dialogue. In: VALERO, P; ZEVENBERGEN, R. (Eds.) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: issues of power in theory and methodology, 2004. p. 145-165.

CLANDININ, D. J. (Ed.). Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2006.

COBB, P. Putting philosophy to work: coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In: LESTER, F.K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2007. p. 3-38.

COCHRAN-SMITH, M. Series forward. In: MEWBORN, D.S. (Series Editor). Teachers engaged in research. Greenwich (CT): Information Age Publishing. 2006. p. ix-xix.

COCHRAN-SMITH, M.; LYTLE, S.L. Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press, 2009.

CONLE, C. The rationality of Narrative Inquiry in research and professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, London, v. 24, n.1, p. 21-33, 2001.

COX, D. C. et al. Repositioning ourselves: acknowledging contradiction. Bolema, Rio Claro (SP), v. 28, n. 49, p. 990-1011, ago. 2014.

CRAIG, C. J. Research on the boundaries: narrative inquiry in the midst of organized school reform. The Journal of Educational Research, Florence (KY), v. 103, p. 123–136, 2010.

CRESWELL, J. W.; PLANO CLARK, V. L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, 2007.

D’AMBROSIO, B. S. et al. Positioning oneself in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston (VA), v. 44, n. 1, p. 11–22, 2013.

D’AMBROSIO, B.; COX, D. C. Finding voice: teacher agency and mathematical leadership development. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION-- NORTH AMERICA, 37., 2015, East Lansing (MI). Anais… East Lansing (MI), Michigan State University, 2015.

D’AMBROSIO, U. Two realities, the academia and the exterior: we have to think in new ways. In: D’AMBROSIO, B.S.; LOPES, C. E. (Eds). Creative insubordination in Brazilian mathematics education research. Raleigh (NC): Lulu Press, 2015a. p.42-52.

D’AMBROSIO, U. From Mathematics Education and Society to Mathematics Education and a sustainable civilization: a threat, an appeal, and a proposal. In: MUKHOPADHYAY, S; GREER, B. (Eds.), PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND SOCIETY CONFERENCE, 8., 2015, Portland (OR). Anais...Portland (OR): Ooligan Press, Portland State University, 2015b. p. 19-30.

ELBAZ, F. Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols, 1983.

ELBOW, P. The believing game or methodological believing. JAEPL: The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, v. 14, p. 1-11, Winter 2008–2009.

EVEN, R. (1999). Integrating academic and practical knowledge in a teacher leaders’ development program. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 38, p. 235–252, 1999.

FINE, M. Distance and other stances: negotiations of power inside feminist research. In: GITLIN, A. D. (Ed.). Power and method. New York: Routledge, 1994. p. 13-35.

GOODCHILD, S. (2002). Exploring students’ goals in classroom activity. In: GOODCHILD, S.; ENGLISH, L. D. (Eds.). Researching mathematics classrooms: a critical examination of methodology, Westport, CT: Praeger’s Publishers, 2002. p. 39-65.

JAWORSKI, B. Reaction to Goodchild. In: GOODCHILD, S.; ENGLISH, L. D. (Eds.). Researching mathematics classrooms: a critical examination of methodology, Westport, CT: Praeger’s Publishers, 2002. p. 59-65.

HARKNESS, S. S. Social constructivism and the Believing Game: a mathematics teacher’s practice and its implications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 70, n. 3, p. 243-258, 2009.

HENDRY, P.M. The future of narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 13, n. 4, p. 487-498, 2007.

HENDRY, P.M. Narrative as inquiry. The Journal of Educational Research, Florence (KY), v. 103, p.72-80, 2010.

JENLINK, P.M. Teacher Identity: The nature of invisibility and the need for recognition. In: JENLINK, P. M. (Ed.). Teacher identity and the struggle for recognition: meeting the challenges of a diverse society. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2014. p. xvii - xxv.

JENSON, R. J. Research ideas for the classroom: early childhood mathematics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.

KILPATRICK, J. A history of research in mathematics education. In: GROUWS, D.A. (Ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, New York (NY): Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992. p. 3-38.

KILPATRICK, J.; MARTIN, G.; SCHIFTER (Eds). A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2003.

KIM, J.H. A romance with narrative inquiry: toward an act of narrative theorizing.In STERN, B.S. (Ed.). Curriculum and teaching dialogue, Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing, v. 10, n. 1 & 2, 2008, p. 251–267.

LESTER, F. K., Jr. In pursuit of practical wisdom in mathematics education research. In: OLIVIER, A.; NEWSTEAD, K. (Eds.), PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 22., 1998, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Anais...Stellenbosch, South Africa: v. 3,1998. p. 199–206.

LESTER, F.K. Jr..; WILIAM, D. On the purpose of mathematics education research: making productive contributions to policy and practice. In: ENGLISH, L. (Ed.). Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002, p.489-506.

MATHEMATICS TEACHER. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2015. Monthly, from August to May.

MATHEMATICS TEACHING IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2015. Monthly, from August to May.

MCNIFF, J. Action research: Principles and practice. Florence (KY): Routledge, 2013.

MCNIFF, J.; WHITEHEAD, J. Doing and writing action research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2009.

MOSCHKOVICH, J.N; BRENNER, M.E. Integrating a Naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In: In: KELLY, A.; LESH, R. (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics education and science education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. p. 457-486.

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Program Solicitation for the Discovery Research PreK-12 Program (DRK-12) (NSF 15-592), 2015. Available at:

http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15592/nsf15592.htm#reviewcrit. Accessed on August 5, 2015.

OWENS, D. T. Research ideas for the classroom: middle grades mathematics. New York: Macmillian Publishing Company, 1993.

PINNEGAR, S.; HAMILTON, M.L. Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: theory, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer, 2009.

RUTHVEN, K. Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. In: ENGLISH, L. (Ed.). Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002, p. 581-598. .

SKOVSMOSE, O. (2015). Uncertainty, pedagogical imagination, explorative reasoning, social justice, and critique. In: MUKHOPADHYAY, S.; GREER, B. (Eds), PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND SOCIETY CONFERENCE 8., 2015, Portland (OR). Anais...Portland (OR): Ooligan Press, Portland State University, 2015. p. 111-122.

SOWDER, J.; SCHAPPELLE, B. (Eds). Lessons learned from research. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2002.

SPANGLER, D.; WANKO, J.J. Principles to action research companion. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, In Preparation.

TOBIN, K. Interpretive research in science education. In: KELLY, A.; LESH, R. (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics education and science education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. p.487-512.

VALERO, P.; ZEVENBERGEN, R. Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: issues of power in theory and methodology (Vol. 35). Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.

WAGNER, J. Ignorance in educational research or, how can you not know that? Educational Researcher, v. 22, n. 5, p. 15-23, 1993.

WHITEHEAD, J. Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, “How do I improve

my practice?”. Cambridge Journal of Education, Cambridge, v. 19, n. 1, p. 41-52, 1989.

WHITEHEAD, J. Self-study, living educational theories, and the generation of educational knowledge.

Studying Teacher Education, London, v.5, n.2, p.107-111, 2009.

WHITEHEAD, J; MCNIFF, J. Action research: living theory. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2006.

WILSON, P. S. Research ideas for the classroom: high school mathematics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.

ZEICHNER, K. M. Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, v.1, n.2, p. 153-172, 1995.

Publicado
2015-12-18
Como Citar
D’AMBROSIO, B. S.; COX, D. An Examination of Current Methodologies in Mathematics Education Through the Lenses of Purpose, Participation, and Privilege. Perspectivas da Educação Matemática, v. 8, n. 18, 18 dez. 2015.