REPERCUSSÕES NO JUDICIÁRIO BRASILEIRO DO CASO MÁRCIA BARBOSA DE SOUZA JULGADO PELA CORTE INTERAMERICANA:

O PROTOCOLO PARA JULGAMENTO COM PERSPECTIVA DE GÊNERO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE EFETIVIDADE DOS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE

Authors

  • Daniela Menengoti Gonçalves Ribeiro Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
  • Vitor Hugo Kutelak de Oliveira Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21671/rdufms.v10i1.23362

Abstract

In 2021, the National Council of Justice (CNJ) of Brazil implemented the Protocol for Judging with a Gender Perspective, an instrument designed to guide judges and legal professionals in the analysis of cases involving gender issues. The need for the development and application of this protocol was intensified by Brazil’s conviction in the Marcia Barbosa de Souza case. The international ruling against Brazil highlighted the importance of structural changes and the adoption of concrete measures to prevent further violations in this area. The protocol establishes objective guidelines to ensure that judgments are conducted with impartiality and equality, taking into account gender-related specificities. However, its actual effectiveness depends on its proper application by legal professionals. As a research problem, this study analyzes whether the Protocol for Judging with a Gender Perspective, as an instrument, promotes the enforcement of personality rights within the Brazilian judiciary. Methodologically, the study adopts a deductive approach, utilizing a case study, the CNJ's sentencing database, as well as documentary and bibliographic research. The general objective of the research is to examine the effectiveness of this protocol within the context of the Brazilian judiciary, considering its mandatory nature as a result of Brazil's conviction in the aforementioned case, where violations of personality rights occurred. To this end, the study will analyze aspects of its implementation, including the assessment of judicial documents, rulings, and procedural practices to determine whether and how the guidelines are being applied in the daily operations of the courts.

Author Biographies

  • Daniela Menengoti Gonçalves Ribeiro, Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)

    Professora do Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Direito do Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR). Coordenadora/Líder dos Grupos de Pesquisa (CNPq): Instrumentos de efetividade dos direitos da personalidade’ e ‘Internacionalização do direito: dilemas constitucionais e internacionais contemporâneos’. Pesquisadora do Instituto Cesumar de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (ICETI). Doutora em Direito-Relações Econômicas Internacionais pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP) com período de pesquisa (doutorado sanduíche) na Université Paris 1 - Panthéon-Sorbonne, França. Mestre em Direito-Relações Internacionais, pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

  • Vitor Hugo Kutelak de Oliveira, Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)

    Doutorando em Direito pela Unicesumar/Maringá. Mestre em Ciências Jurídicas da Unicesumar/Maringá.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Revista Direito UFMS

Section

Artigos

License

I (we), below signed, transfer all the Copyright rights of the article entitled (title) to the UFMS LAW REVIEW – UFMSLR.

I (we) declare that the paper is original and that it is not being considered for the publication in another journal, be it in electronic or printed format.

I (we) have complete knowledge the journal reserves the right to effectuate alterations of normative, orthographic and grammatical order in the originals, with the objective to maintain the cult pattern of the language, respecting, however, the authors’ style and that the originals will not be returned to the authors.