THE BRAZILIAN AMNESTY LAW AND THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21671/rdufms.v10i1.23455Abstract
This study analyzes the main differences and overlaps between the Brazilian Amnesty Law (Law No. 6,683/79) and international human rights legislation, with an emphasis on the Inter-American Human Rights System of the Organization of American States (OAS) and the Global System of the United Nations. The objective is to understand the differences between Brazilian legislation and human rights regulations, with a view to identifying the impacts of these differences on Brazilian justice. In this way, the aim is to present the general aspects of the Amnesty Law, to understand how international human rights treaties act in institutional crises, in addition to comparing Brazilian law with international treaties on the subject. Deductive reasoning was used as a research method, which allows an analysis focused on correlating Brazilian legislation and international commitments to explain how the implementation of the Law in Brazil conflicts with international legislation. The results of the research indicate the complexity and duality of the Brazilian Amnesty Law, which is important in the historical transitional period, but which impedes justice in the country, with the accountability of agents who committed crimes against humanity and reparations to victims, their families and descendants. The Amnesty Law, analyzed constitutionally and in light of the international treaties ratified by the country, should be revised.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I (we), below signed, transfer all the Copyright rights of the article entitled (title) to the UFMS LAW REVIEW – UFMSLR.
I (we) declare that the paper is original and that it is not being considered for the publication in another journal, be it in electronic or printed format.
I (we) have complete knowledge the journal reserves the right to effectuate alterations of normative, orthographic and grammatical order in the originals, with the objective to maintain the cult pattern of the language, respecting, however, the authors’ style and that the originals will not be returned to the authors.



