ESTADO DE COISAS INCONSTITUCIONAL: ATIVISMO JUDICIAL NA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DA COLÔMBIA E A MIGRAÇÃO DE IDEIAS CONSTITUCIONAIS PARA O STF

  • Daniel Castanha de Freitas
  • Flávio Garcia Cabral TESTE
  • William Ivan Gallo Aponte

Abstract

The paper intends to analyze the judicial activism practiced by the Constitutional Court of Colombia and the Brazilian Supreme Court, with emphasis on the study of the unconstitutional State of Affairs theory, to investigate the compatibility between the legal systems and their consequences for the construction of legitimate judgments. In the first chapter, an overview of judicial activism, its origin and development in the democratic period will be presented, in addition to presenting the concept related to the judicialization of politics. Afterwards, the research discusses the construction and evolution of the theory of the Unconstitutional State of Things in Colombia as materialization of dialogical judicial activism, analyzing decisions of the Constitutional Court in the most representative Sentences. Following, the analysis of judicial activism within the scope of the Supreme Federal Court, through ADPF nº 347, which invokes the theory in question regarding the prison system, in addition to discussing the conformity of the migration process through which it went through the Unconstitutional State of Things, authorizing its application in Brazil. In conclusion, the experience of constitutional migration carried out is positive, which strengthens democratic legitimacy. The method used is the hypothetical-deductive, based on a specific bibliographic survey and jurisprudential data.

Author Biographies

Daniel Castanha de Freitas

Professor de Direito Administrativo e de Fundamentos de Direito Público da FAE Centro Universitário (PR). Professor da Pós-Graduação em Direito Administrativo do Instituto Romeu Felipe Bacellar (PR). Doutorando e Mestre em Direito pela PUCPR. Pesquisador membro do Núcleo de Pesquisas em Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Humano – NUPED/PUCPR. Advogado.

Flávio Garcia Cabral, TESTE

TESTE

William Ivan Gallo Aponte

Professor pesquisador da Faculdade de Direito da Universidad Externado de Colombia. Mestrando em Direito pela PUCPR. Bacharel em Direito pela Universidad Externado de Colombia. Pesquisador membro do Núcleo de Pesquisas em Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Humano – NUPED/PUCPR. Editor adjunto da Revista REDOEDA. Vice-presidente da RIJDA.

Published
2021-12-02
Issue
Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Revista Direito UFMS
Section
Artigos

I (we), below signed, transfer all the Copyright rights of the article entitled (title) to the UFMS LAW REVIEW – UFMSLR.

I (we) declare that the paper is original and that it is not being considered for the publication in another journal, be it in electronic or printed format.

I (we) have complete knowledge the journal reserves the right to effectuate alterations of normative, orthographic and grammatical order in the originals, with the objective to maintain the cult pattern of the language, respecting, however, the authors’ style and that the originals will not be returned to the authors.