THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Abstract
The judges in Strasbourg claim to reason. Our scope will now try to illustrate their position in relation to the two different areas. First, the probative limits that, in some national contexts, seem to be aimed primarily at making the search for truth in the process more efficient; after that, the attention will be shifted to the rules of proof placed to protect the interests of the endoprocessual or extraprocessual other than the ascertainment of the facts.
I (we), below signed, transfer all the Copyright rights of the article entitled (title) to the UFMS LAW REVIEW – UFMSLR.
I (we) declare that the paper is original and that it is not being considered for the publication in another journal, be it in electronic or printed format.
I (we) have complete knowledge the journal reserves the right to effectuate alterations of normative, orthographic and grammatical order in the originals, with the objective to maintain the cult pattern of the language, respecting, however, the authors’ style and that the originals will not be returned to the authors.