Práticas pedagógicas docentes e desempenho escolar no Ensino Médio brasileiro

Carmem Frühauf de  Oliveira; Débora de Lima Braga Penha; Evandro Camargos Teixeira

doi:10.55028/m5kdm911

Authors

Carmem Frühauf de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-9566
Débora de Lima Braga Penha Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-3009
Evandro Camargos Teixeira Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-2103

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55028/m5kdm911

Abstract

This study examines the association between teachers’ pedagogical practices and the performance of Brazilian upper secondary students in Portuguese Language and Mathematics. Microdata from the 2017 National Basic Education Assessment are used, the most recent edition that allows for the systematic and comparable construction of pedagogical practice indicators at the national level. The empirical strategy relies on multilevel models, considering the hierarchical structure of educational data, with students, teachers, and schools organized into three levels. Pedagogical practices are measured through synthetic indicators, including a general index and subject-specific indices. The results show that the general pedagogical practices indicator is positively and statistically significantly associated with student performance in both subjects. When distinguishing between general and subject-specific practices, Mathematics-specific practices are positively associated with proficiency in that discipline, whereas no statistically significant effects are observed for Portuguese Language. The findings suggest that diversified and consistent classroom strategies are relevant to upper secondary achievement, with differentiated effects across subject areas. The evidence underscores the importance of policies focused on teacher training and on strengthening effective pedagogical practices, particularly in contexts marked by persistent educational inequalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carmem Frühauf de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)

Mestre em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) e graduada em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Trabalha na Secretaria de Estado de Economia do Distrito Federal. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. E-mail: cfruhauf@gmail.com
Débora de Lima Braga Penha , Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)

Mestre em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) e graduada em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade Federal do Acre (UFAC)
Evandro Camargos Teixeira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)

Doutor em Economia Aplicada pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Professor Associado do Departamento de Economia da Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV). Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. E-mail: evandro.teixeira@ufv.br

References

BOURDIEU, Pierre; passeron, Jean-Claude. La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1970.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. The forms of capital. In: RICHARDSON, John G. (org.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood, 1986. p. 241–258.

CHAPMAN, David W.; ADAMS, Don. The quality of education. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.

CRONBACH, Lee Joseph. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, v. 16, n. 3, 1951.

DARLING-HAMMOND, Linda; Flook, Lisa; Cook-Harvey, Channa; Barron, Brigid; Osher, David. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, v. 24, n. 2, p. 97–140, 2020.

GIFI, Albert. Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester: Wiley, 1990.

GOLDSTEIN, Harvey. Multilevel statistical models. 4. ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2011.

HANUSHEK, Eric Alan; RIVKIN, Steven G. Teacher quality. Handbook of the Economics of Education, Amsterdam, v. 2, p. 1051–1078, 2006.

HANUSHEK, Eric Alan; RIVKIN, Steven G. The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, v. 4, p. 131–157, 2012.

HANUSHEK, Eric Alan; WOESSMANN, Ludger. The economics of education. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2021.

HATTIE, John. Visible learning. The sequel. London: Routledge, 2023.

HOX, Joop J.; MOERBEEK, Mirjam; VAN DE SCHOOT, Rens. Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. 3. ed. New York: Routledge, 2018.

INEP (Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira). Relatório Brasil no PISA 2022. Brasília: INEP, 2023.

KANE, Thomas J.; MCCAFFREY, Daniel F.; MILLER, Trey; STAIGER, Douglas O. Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of Human Resources, v. 46, n. 3, p. 587–613, 2011.

KANE, Thomas J.; STAIGER, Douglas O. Gathering feedback for teaching. Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Measures of Effective Teaching (MET), 2012.

KOO, Terry K.; LI, Mae Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, v. 15, n. 2, p. 155–163, 2016.

MARZANO, Robert J.; PICKERING, Debra J.; POLLOCK, Jane E. Classroom instruction that works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.

MORAES, Rodrigo F.; BELLUZZO, Walter. Desigualdade de oportunidades educacionais no Brasil: evidências a partir do SAEB. Economia Aplicada, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5–38, 2014.

NASCIMENTO, Paulo Meyer; CRUZ, Priscila; MONTEIRO, Luciano. Ensino médio no Brasil: permanência, abandono e desigualdades educacionais. Cadernos de Pesquisa, v. 50, n. 176, p. 522–549, 2020.

NYE, Barbara; KONSTANTOPOULOS, Spyros; HEDGES, Larry V. How large are teacher effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, v. 26, n. 3, p. 237–257, 2004.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). PISA 2018 results. What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Education at a glance 2020. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.

REYNOLDS, David; SAMMONS, Pam; DE FRAINE, Bieke; VAN DAMME, Jan; TOWNSEND, Tony; TEDDLIE, Charles; STRINGFIELD, Sam. Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, v. 25, n. 2, p. 197–230, 2014.

ROSENSHINE, Barak. Principles of instruction: research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, v. 36, n. 1, p. 12–19, 2012.

SAMMONS, Pam. Equity and educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, v. 21, n. 2, p. 91–120, 2010.

SCHEERENS, Jaap. Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. A critical review of the knowledge base. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.

SENKEVICS, Adriano; CARVALHO, Marília Pinto de. Ensino médio no Brasil: desigualdades e permanência escolar. Educação e Pesquisa, v. 46, e217701, 2020.

SHULMAN, Lee S. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1–22, 1987.

SOARES, José Francisco; ALVES, Maria Teresa Gonzaga. Efeitos de escolas e professores na aprendizagem dos alunos. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, v. 30, n. 74, p. 428–462, 2019.